Search | ITS Deployment Evaluation

Maintain stakeholder buy-in and engage the community throughout the design process to ensure your Travel Management and Coordination Center is successful.

The report goes into significant detail regarding the process that SLO County used to create their final TMCC. Some key best practices and lessons learned are detailed below, organized by the stage…

Content type

Lesson

Date Posted

03/26/2019

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Multi-modal Coordination (PT14), Transit Connection Protection (PT17)

Geolocation links

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Conversion to card-based electronic payment system for small transit agency costs $380,800.

The objective of this study is to examine industry trends and experiences related to the institutional, technological, data management, customer acceptance, and costs and benefits of regional transit…

Content type

System Cost

Made Public Date

02/09/2016

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Transit Fare Collection Management (PT04)

Geolocation links

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Deployment of an Advanced Public Transit System (APTS) for a mid-size transit system costs $150,000.

The San Luis Obispo (SLO) Transit pilot project for Efficient Deployment of Advanced Public Transit Systems (EDAPTS) in California was deployed in 2001 and was studied in 2008 to assess the benefit/…

Content type

System Cost

Made Public Date

07/29/2011

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Transit Fare Collection Management (PT04), Transit Traveler Information (PT08), Transit Pedestrian Indication (PT11), Transit Vehicle at Station/Stop Warnings (PT12), Transit Vehicle Tracking (PT01), Personnel Device Maintenance (SU13), Personalized Traveler Information (TI02), Trip Planning and Payment (TI04)

Geolocation links

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Implementation of ITS with AVL, real-time passenger information, and electronic fare media in a mid-sized transit system resulted in a minimum 3.9:1 benefit/cost ratio.

Methodology This study estimated the value of various benefits for the system based on rider surveys which evaluated each rider’s willingness to pay (WTP) for various services, such as real-time…

Content type

Benefit

Date Posted

06/30/2011

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Transit Fare Collection Management (PT04), Transit Traveler Information (PT08), Transit Pedestrian Indication (PT11), Transit Vehicle Tracking (PT01)

Geolocation links

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Special Search Areas

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Maintain stakeholder buy-in and engage the community throughout the design process to ensure your Travel Management and Coordination Center is successful.

Conversion to card-based electronic payment system for small transit agency costs $380,800.

Deployment of an Advanced Public Transit System (APTS) for a mid-size transit system costs $150,000.

Implementation of ITS with AVL, real-time passenger information, and electronic fare media in a mid-sized transit system resulted in a minimum 3.9:1 benefit/cost ratio.

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE

Focus Areas

Connect

Topics

Search Benefits, Costs, Lessons Learned

Special Search Areas

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Maintain stakeholder buy-in and engage the community throughout the design process to ensure your Travel Management and Coordination Center is successful.

Conversion to card-based electronic payment system for small transit agency costs $380,800.

Deployment of an Advanced Public Transit System (APTS) for a mid-size transit system costs $150,000.

Implementation of ITS with AVL, real-time passenger information, and electronic fare media in a mid-sized transit system resulted in a minimum 3.9:1 benefit/cost ratio.

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE

Focus Areas

Connect

Topics