ITS for Road Weather Safety

According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), adverse weather is the second largest cause of non-recurrent congestion behind incidents.1 Unexpected severe weather, in particular, is a major cause of harm to the safety and mobility of the transportation system because it often leads to poor visibility, slick pavement, sudden stops and slowdowns, and in some cases multi-car pileups, resulting in serious injuries and/or fatalities.

 For example: 

Although the weather cannot be changed, agencies can mitigate its impacts by reporting accurate, real-time weather information to the public, proactively using traffic management solutions to lower the risk of weather-related crashes, and promptly detecting and responding to crashes when they do occur. Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies offer powerful tools that could save lives, reduce travel time, and bring economic benefits. Read more and explore the data visualizations below to better understand the issue of weather-related roadway fatalities and how ITS technologies can be a tool for reducing them.


Weather-Related Roadway Fatality Trends

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Fatality and Injury Reporting System (FARS) provides yearly data on fatalities and injuries suffered in motor vehicle traffic crashes.2 Below, "weather-related roadway fatalities" refer to fatalities in roadway crashes that FARS indicate were under various weather types. These weather types are grouped into four broader categories: high winds & blowing particles, low visibility, rain & flooding, and snow & ice.

Weather-Related Roadway Fatalities by Year and Weather Type

 Source: Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Data pulled April 2025.

FARS data indicate that since 2010, weather-related roadway fatalities have increased by about 13 percent, from 3,306 in 2010 to 3,722 in 2023. The weather type associated with these fatal crashes has also changed over time. In the five-year period of 2019 to 2023, the number of snow/ice fatalities decreased by 28 percent, while the number of low visibility fataliities increased by 17 percent.

FARS data from 2021-2023 show slightly more urban versus rural weather-related roadway fatalities. These weather-related crash fatalities are most frequently associated with rain and flooding conditions. 

 

Urban-Rural Divide in Weather-Related Roadway Fatalities, 2021-2023

Source: Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Data pulled April 2025.


Multi-Car Pileups

A major concern around adverse weather on our roadways is the threat of multi-vehicle crashes. For purposes of this visualization, multi-vehicle crashes are defined as crashes involving three or more vehicles. Decreased visibility and sudden stopping can lead to situations in which drivers struggle to respond in time to avoid colliding with other vehicles on the road. Adverse weather conditions can lead to longer crash response times, meaning vehicles may stay on the roadway longer in unsafe situations, and injured travelers do not get the prompt medical attention needed during this critical time.

Multi-Vehicle Fatal Roadway Crashes Under Adverse Weather

Source: Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Data pulled April 2025.

FARS data show that the number of fatal multi-car pileups under adverse weather conditions have been relatively stable over the years. However, since 2017 the number of crashes has remained near or above 250 a year.

The map below shows fatal, multi-vehicle crashes under adverse weather conditions from the years 2021-2023. Each circle represents one crash with the size of the circle representing the number of vehicles involved. The circles are colored by weather type. Filters are available to drill down by year and weather category.

Weather-Related Multi-Vehicle Fatal Roadway Crashes (2021-2023)

Legend showing circle size denoting number of vehicles involved

Source: Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Data pulled April 2025.


ITS Can Help Mitigate the Effects of Extreme Weather Events on Transportation

ITS technologies support real-time situational awareness for transportation agency staff and road users, allowing them to understand and adapt to dangerous road conditions by enabling traveler information, traffic interventions, and post-event management.

Example ITS technologies that can support these capabilities include, but are not limited to, the following (click on each phrase to learn more): 

ESS

An Environmental Sensor Station (ESS) in a snowy mountain landscape, featuring a weather monitoring tower surrounded by snow-covered terrain and distant mountain peaks.
Source: Montana DOT

Vehicle to Everything (V2X) Communications

Photo diagram of cars moving through an intersection, with arcs of light connecting cars symbolizing V2x connectivity
Source: USDOT
  

Dynamic Message Signs (DMS)

Vehicles driving on a snow-covered highway with low visibility. Overhead electronic signs display warnings: "RESTRICTED LANES CLOSED DO NOT ENTER" and "ICY CONDITIONS POSSIBLE USE CAUTION." Snow-covered trees line the sides of the road.
Source: New Jersey DOT

Variable Speed Limits (VSL)

A busy multi-lane highway with vehicles traveling under a set of overhead electronic signs displaying a speed limit of 45 mph. The highway is surrounded by green trees, and multiple overpasses are visible in the background. Directional signs indicate exits for W Seattle and Columbian Way. Traffic is moderate, with cars in all lanes.
Source: Washington State DOT

Agency Adoption of ITS to Improve Safety in Extreme Weather Events

The ITS Deployment Tracking Survey, conducted approximately every three years, measures the deployment of ITS among freeway, arterial, and transit management agencies in a subset of large metropolitan areas. Freeway agencies are largely comprised of State DOT districts, while arterial agencies are primarily local (e.g., city, town, county) agencies. The survey tracks adoption of ITS for a variety of use cases, including collecting data on ITS technologies that could be used to mitigate the effects of extreme weather, such as real time traveler information (RTI), dynamic message signs (DMS), and ESS that helps inform motorists of weather conditions.

Agency Adoption of ITS Technologies to Mitigate the Impacts of Extreme Weather Events

Source: USDOT ITS JPO Deployment Statistics

Generally, adoption rates for these technologies were higher among freeway agencies versus arterial agencies. The 2020 ITS Deployment Tracking Survey for freeway agencies found that 98 percent of surveyed freeway agencies in a subset of large metropolitan areas have adopted RTI, 94 percent adopted DMS, and 76 percent adopted ESS. About half of arterial agencies (54 percent) adopted RTI, while 27 percent adopted DMS, and 14 percent adopted ESS.

 

Note: Contains DMS as one of the technologies. Source: USDOT ITS JPO Deployment Statistics

Other RTI adopted by surveyed agencies included 511, social media, email and text/SMS alerts, custom mobile apps, third-party mobile apps, websites, and highway advisory radio. Slightly more than 50 percent of arterial agencies surveyed had adopted RTI, while nearly 100 percent of freeway agencies had.

Besides these applications mentioned above, other technologies, such as road weather information systems (RWIS), weather-responsive traffic signals, and road weather connected vehicle (CV) applications, are being deployed nationwide. Explore the interactive Map of Selected Road Weather ITS Deployments visualization to see selected deployments of different road weather-related ITS technologies across the United States over the last 10+ years. 

State and local agencies around the country have found success implementing extreme weather safety technologies. Below are three examples of agencies successfully adopting extreme weather safety ITS systems and their resulting benefits.

Wyoming DOT's CV Pilot Deployment:

Wyoming DOT, in an effort to reduce the number of adverse weather-related crashes, equipped 320 vehiclesincluding commercial trucks, highway patrol vehicles, and snowplowswith devices that broadcast weather alerts. The agency observed an improvement in speed limit compliance with an increase in vehicles keeping speeds within +/- 10mph of the limit—from 58.9 percent without alerts to 66.4 percent with alerts—across different weather conditions. You can learn more about this case study in the Benefits, Costs and Lessons Learned Database.

Improved Speed Compliance with CV Alerts in Adverse WeatherSource: WYDOT.

Michigan DOT's DMS Driver Compliance Study:

Michigan DOT investigated driver compliance with DMS messages to better understand situations where they are most effective. The state calculated odds ratios, which measure the probability of an event (driver compliance) occurring in the exposed group (with DMS) to the non-exposed group (without DMS), to understand how strongly the DMS messages were associated with changes in driver behavior. Drivers who found DMS useful in bad weather were 6.8 to 15.2 times more likely to alter their behavior consistent with the DMS message. You can learn more about this case study in the Benefits, Costs and Lessons Learned Database.

Increased Driver Compliance Due to Inclement Weather MessagesSource: MDOT.

Ohio DOT’s VSL Implementation

In December 2016, massive snow squalls impacted a major corridor on Interstate 90 near Lake Erie that led to a 50+ car pileup, resulting in a 14-hour closure. With pileups during unexpected lake effect snowstorms becoming far too common, Ohio DOT sought to improve safety along a 12-mile stretch of this corridor. They implemented a Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) approach using weather sensor stations and cameras to monitor weather conditions. 

Data collected from these systems were used to adjust the digital VSL signs placed along the corridor. These signs dynamically change the speed limit to optimize safety under variable conditions. In the two years following VSL implementation, the total number of crashes declined by 21 percent, the number of crashes while snowing declined by 40 percent, and crash clearance times declined by 31 minutes despite there being more snowy days. No fatalities or major pileups occurred in the corridor during the two winters seasons after VSL implementation. You can learn more about this case study in the Benefits, Costs and Lessons Learned Database.

Crash Reductions After VSL Implementation, Especially in SnowSource: ODOT.


ITS Benefits - Road Weather Safety

Benefits of ITS deployments are recorded and stored in the ITS Benefits database, part of the larger Benefits, Costs, and Lessons Learned databases maintained by the ITS JPO. The ITS Benefits database contains records on the benefits of ITS according to goals identified by the U.S. Department of Transportation, such as safety, mobility, efficiency, productivity, and customer satisfaction.

The following examples are among the many ITS Benefits located in the Benefits section of the Benefits, Costs, and Lessons Learned (BCLL) database.

Traveler Information:

 
West Virginia’s fog detection and warning system was estimated to result in a benefit-cost ratio of 1.57 based on crash data (2023-B01810).
 
 
In North Carolina, a wet pavement detection system on I-85 yielded a 39 percent reduction in the annual crash rate under wet conditions (2008-B00530).
 
 
A simulation study estimated that implementing traveler information messages on I-80 in Wyoming would improve safety benefits from Weather-Responsive Traffic Management (WRTM) using CV applications by 20 percent in severe weather, as measured by inverse time-to-collision (2022-B01623).
 
 
The Wyoming CV Pilot found that over 50 percent of drivers given a work zone or winter weather alert reduced their speed (2023-B01735).
 

Transportation Management Center (TMC) Interventions:

 
A simulation study examining weather-responsive management strategies (WRMS) using CV applications for I-80 in Wyoming estimated that prepositioning snowplows at strategic points could reduce both travel times and the potential for crashes in snowy weather by about 10 percent and could decrease snowplow operation time by 33 percent (2022-B01623).
 
 
Researchers conducted benefit-cost analyses for different software/geographic conditions to quantify the potential agency and societal benefits of RWIS. Modeled results showed estimated savings of up to $2.2 million in crash occurrence and delay costs (2021-B01589).
 
 
A weather responsive VSL system in Colorado reduced winter weather-related crashes by 100 percent on a section of highway subject to extreme temperature changes (2014-00894).
 
 
A field study in Salt Lake City, Utah shows routes of connected snowplows had a larger reduction in roadway crash rate per million vehicle miles traveled (up to 3.87) than their non-equipped counterparts (1.82) (2023-B01752).
 

Post-Incident Management:

 
A before-after study of Ohio DOT’s VSL deployment on the I-90 corridor during the winter season showed improved incident clearance times by an average of 31 minutes, reduced secondary crashes by 25 percent, and reduced travel delays by 83 percent (2021-B01568).
 
 
An Emergency Communications for Evacuation (EVAC) mobility application tested in Louisiana found a 20 percent reduction in time congested in a simulation of the 2005 Hurricane Katrina evacuation (2015-B01047).
 

In addition to the benefits from the BCLL database, ITS JPO’s ITS and Extreme Weather Events infographics on Snow and Ice and Flooding provide examples of how ITS can help enhance safety and efficiency during extreme weather events.


ITS Costs - Road Weather Safety

  

There are a broad range of ITS technologies and applications that can be used to enhance extreme weather roadway safety. The figure shows the frequency of unit cost ranges of the ESS and WMS deployed by state DOTs from 2017-2021.

Roadside Detection (RS-D), ESS or WMS Adjusted Capital Cost Histogram (2017-2021)
Cost data adjusted to 2020 dollars.

A few examples of the costs of extreme weather safety systems are highlighted below:

 
Montana RWIS software enhancements cost up to $173,800 annually, depending on forecasting functionalities and system expansion (2021-SC00491).
 
 
The traffic surveillance system for upstate California was projected to cost between $75,000 and $150,000 for capital expenses and $2,000 for annual operation and maintenance. Additionally, the RWIS was projected to cost between $100,000 and $150,000 for capital expenses and $5,000 for annual operation and maintenance (2019-SC00427).
 
 
A fog detection and warning system in West Virginia was estimated to cost $1,031,000 for capital and installation expenses (2023-SC00547).
 
 
Winter-related Integrating Mobile Observations (IMO) cost $30 per month per plow truck in communications and data, in addition to $8,700 per year for contract weather services (2020-B01495).
 
 
Texas DOT spent $13,000 per location for an upgrade of their pump station monitoring system to better manage flooding. The system allows maintenance crews to monitor the equipment, dispatch repair technicians, and dispatch crews to set barricades when flood conditions are imminent (2014-SC00301).

ITS Lessons Learned - Road Weather Safety

ITS Lessons Learned capture the real-life experience of practitioners in their planning, deployment, operation, maintenance, and evaluation of ITS projects. They are a reflection on what was done right, what one would do differently, and how a project could be more effective in the future.

A few examples of ITS Lessons Learned related to extreme weather safety are highlighted below:

 
Disseminate notifications of emergency alerts and travel bans via mass text messaging to reach residents, per lessons learned from the December 2022 Buffalo blizzard (2023-L01202).
 
 
Consider automating weather-related messages on digital message sign systems, in addition to travel times, using data from ESS devices (2023-L01190).
 
 
Consider using a web-based mapping tool to improve stakeholders’ real-time and forecasted flood inundation depths along roads, bridges, and other transportation assets (2023-L01195).
 
 
Standardize mobile weather sensor data for use under future connected vehicle-enabled weather responsive traffic management systems, as learned from pilot studies conducted in Washington and Delaware (2022-L01085).
 
 

The examples highlighted above are among the many ITS Lessons Learned located in the Success Strategies section of the ITS Deployment Evaluation website.


U.S. DOT Extreme Weather Safety Initiatives

With safety as its top priority, U.S. DOT has undertaken a number of efforts to improve road weather safety. These include the Road Weather Management Program (RWMP), and Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) tools highlighted below.

Road Weather Management Program

The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Road Weather Management Program (RWMP) is dedicated to enhancing the resilience of the U.S. highway system by mitigating the impacts that weather can have on the system. Through collaboration and leadership in the road weather community, and by pioneering the development and application of innovative technologies and strategies, the RWMP aims to improve the management of the transportation system and minimize the impacts of ever-changing adverse road weather conditions.3

Implementation of Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation Tools for Road Weather Connected Vehicle Applications

Among FHWA's RWMP initiatives, the development of weather-responsive traffic management (WRTM) focuses on actionable strategies for system management and operations. Analysis, Modeling and Simulation (AMS) tools have been used by FHWA and agencies to assess the effectiveness of data sets, strategies, and methods used in WRTM in improving the operational response. Specifically, AMS can be used in both general-purpose commercially available platforms and customized research models tailored for CV systems to assess traffic impacts of extreme weather events. To learn more about AMS tools for road weather CV applications, visit FHWA's report on Implementation of Analysis, Modeling and Simulation Tools for Road Weather Connected Vehicle Applications.

For more information on road weather management, please visit: https://ops.fhwa.gov/weather.

Every Day Counts

Every Day Counts (EDC) Logo showing a curved two-lane road and capital letters "E", "D", and "C".
  Every Day Counts (Source: FHWA)

Every Day Counts (EDC) is a State-based model run by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that identifies and rapidly deploys proven, yet underutilized innovations that make our transportation system adaptable, sustainable, and safer for all.4 Every two years, FHWA works with State transportation departments, local governments, tribes, private industry and other stakeholders to identify a new collection of innovations to champion.

Round 5 of the EDC Initiative includes Weather-Responsive Management Strategies that promotes the use of road weather data from mobile and CV technologies to support traffic and maintenance management strategies during inclement weather.


References

  1. U.S. DOT FHWA, "Road Weather Management Overview". Last modified February 2023. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/overview.htm

  2. U.S. DOT NHTSA, Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). 2021. https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-data-systems/fatality-analysis-reporting-system 

  3. U.S. DOT FHWA, "About Road Weather Management Program." Last modified January 2024. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/about.htm 

  4. U.S. DOT FHWA, "About Every Day Counts (EDC)". Last modified June 2023. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/about-edc.cfm