The researchers observed 785 people riding e-scooters and 2,960 people riding bicycles. Of these, 90 percent of the e-scooter riders were riding shared e-scooters, from companies such as Bird and Lime, and nine percent of cyclists were riding shared bicycles.
In all, 45 percent, or nearly half, of e-scooter users were riding the scooters in violation of local Brisbane laws. The most common violation was not wearing a helmet, with 39 percent either not wearing a helmet or wearing one that was improperly fastened. Riders were also observed riding on the road or riding with a passenger.
Cyclists, even those using shared bikes, complied with the law at higher rates than e-scooter users; 81 percent of shared bike riders wore a helmet correctly.
Finally, privately owned and operated e-scooters had higher rates of compliance with rules and regulations. Only 10 percent of private e-scooters were in found to be in violation of law. Ninety-eight (98) percent of private bicyclists wore a helmet.
- Current rules governing e-scooter usage may not be adequate to protect riders and reduce collision risks
- The low rates of helmet compliance may indicate that people do have enough access to helmets when using shared e-scooters. Therefore, municipalities should work to ensure widespread helmet availability and work to enforce helmet laws if applicable.
(Our website has many links to other organizations. While we offer these electronic linkages for your convenience in accessing transportation-related information, please be aware that when you exit our website, the privacy and accessibility policies stated on our website may not be the same as that on other websites.)