Location Name
Maricopa County
State
Country
Geo Type
Latitude
33.29
Longitude
-112.43
Arizona, United States
Content that references this location
Align Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Deployments with Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) Objectives and Plan for Incremental Scale and Long-Term Operations.
The study documented lessons drawn from deployment discussions, leadership communication sessions, and sessions addressing organizational and operational requirements for large-scale V2X…
Content type
Date Posted
03/30/2026
Taxonomy (ARC-IT)
Work Zone Management (MC06),
Work Zone Safety Monitoring (MC07),
Emergency Vehicle Preemption (PS03),
Transit Signal Priority (PT09),
Connected Vehicle System Monitoring and Management (SU01),
ITS Communications (SU07),
Connected Vehicle Traffic Signal System (TM04),
Autonomous Vehicle Safety Systems (VS01)
Geolocation links
Consider requirements definition and system design Issues for Archived Data Management Systems.
ADMS offer numerous potential benefits, including the ability to better evaluate system performance, plan for operations, and support future investment decisions. Washington State TRAC, for example,…
Content type
Date Posted
06/27/2007
Consider the project needs when selecting the most appropriate procurement method.
Institutional issues will seldom cause an ITS project to come to a halt, but they can significantly impact the implementation and deployment through increased costs and delayed schedules. The…
Content type
Date Posted
08/09/2006
Geolocation links
Establish a working group among public sector partners to address liability issues.
An area of potential concern for many metropolitan areas is the sharing of system control by more than a single jurisdiction. This is a frequent concern for jurisdictions that operate a traffic…
Content type
Date Posted
08/09/2006
Taxonomy (ARC-IT)
Traffic Signal Control (TM03),
Integrated Decision Support and Demand Management (TM09)
Geolocation links
AI-Driven Adaptive Signal Control Pilot in Maricopa County, Arizona, Reduced Vehicle Delay by 322 Hours per Week at the Project Intersection.
METHODOLOGY
The system monitored traffic at an intersection using a camera connected via Wi-Fi to an on-site computer with an AI optimization engine. This engine communicated with a central virtual…
Content type
Date Posted
12/30/2025
Taxonomy (ARC-IT)
Traffic Signal Control (TM03)
Geolocation links
Application of Adaptive Signal Control Technology in Arizona Resulted in up to $25,900 Weekday and $9,500 Weekend Cost Savings, and up to 51 Percent Weekday and 43 Percent Weekend Travel Time Savings.
Methodology
A system engineering process was initiated in 2012 to determine if ASCT was the appropriate solution. The following four project areas with different operating needs and priorities were…
Content type
Date Posted
03/30/2021
Geolocation links
The Capital Cost of an AI-Driven Adaptive Signal Control Was Estimated at $115,810 per Intersection with $10,050 in Annual Operating Expenses.
Traffic signals play a vital role in managing the safe and efficient movement of people and vehicles through intersections, forming the backbone of urban traffic operations. This project…
Content type
Made Public Date
01/28/2026
Taxonomy (ARC-IT)
Traffic Signal Control (TM03)
Geolocation links
