Search | ITS Deployment Evaluation

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) Using Eco-Friendly Traffic Optimization Systems Can Reduce Fuel Consumption up to 15 Percent and Waiting Time Up to 85 Percent at Equipped Intersections.

METHODOLOGY The ECoTOp system co-optimizes traffic signal and vehicle dynamics to maximize the throughput from all phases in the cycle and minimize the total energy consumption of each CAV in all the…

Content type

Benefit

Date Posted

05/30/2023

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Eco-Traffic Signal Timing (ST02), Connected Vehicle Traffic Signal System (TM04)

Geolocation links

California, United States

An Integrated Controller Optimizing Energy Consumption and Signal Timing Through V2I and V2V Communications Was Predicted To Improve Energy Efficiency by Up to 18 Percent and Reduce Total Delay Up to 47 Percent Based on Simulation Results.

METHODOLOGY This proposed controller was first tested at an isolated signalized intersection to validate its performance and then on an arterial road in downtown Blacksburg with multiple traffic…

Content type

Benefit

Date Posted

03/28/2023

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Eco-Traffic Signal Timing (ST02)

Geolocation links

Blacksburg, Virginia, United States

Deploy Traffic Optimization Applications for Connected and Automated Vehicles at Moderate or High Traffic Volume and Delay Signalized Intersections to Maximize Its Effectiveness.

Simulation Results Suggest That Connected Automated Vehicle (CAV) Applications That Support Traffic Optimization on Signalized Corridors Can Reduce Vehicle Stops, But Have Limited Impacts on Overall Travel Times and Delay.

Cooperative Eco-Driving Was Projected to Reduce Energy Consumption by Seven Percent and Pollutant Emissions by up to 59 Percent in the City of Riverside, California.

The cost to equip 10 intersections with dedicated short range communications (DSRC) was estimated at $70K to $80K in the Seattle area.

Content references source material no longer available at its original location.

In Detroit, the design and construction of traffic signal interconnection upgrades, DSRC field infrastructure, and communication systems designed to support CV applications cost $1.33 million on a 6-mile corridor and $1.42 million on a 12-mile corrid

In response to state agency reporting requirements this source document outlined estimates for Connected Vehicle (CV) infrastructure deployment expenditures in SE Michigan. Details for two…

Content type

System Cost

Made Public Date

07/18/2019

Taxonomy (ARC-IT) Infrastructure-Based Traffic Surveillance (TM01), Integrated Decision Support and Demand Management (TM09), Emissions Monitoring (ST01), Eco-Traffic Signal Timing (ST02), Eco-Traffic Metering (ST03), Eco-Approach and Departure at Signalized Intersections (ST08), Connected Vehicle Traffic Signal System (TM04), Infrastructure Enhanced Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (VS15), Infrastructure Monitoring (MC09), Transportation Infrastructure Protection (PS09), Roadside Lighting (ST04), Connected Vehicle System Monitoring and Management (SU01), Core Authorization (SU02), Map Management (SU04), Location and Time (SU05), Object Registration and Discovery (SU06), ITS Communications (SU07), Security and Credentials Management (SU08), Device Certification and Enrollment (SU09), Center Maintenance (SU10), Field Equipment Maintenance (SU11)

Geolocation links

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Displaying 1 - 10 of 37

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) Using Eco-Friendly Traffic Optimization Systems Can Reduce Fuel Consumption up to 15 Percent and Waiting Time Up to 85 Percent at Equipped Intersections.

An Integrated Controller Optimizing Energy Consumption and Signal Timing Through V2I and V2V Communications Was Predicted To Improve Energy Efficiency by Up to 18 Percent and Reduce Total Delay Up to 47 Percent Based on Simulation Results.

Deploy Traffic Optimization Applications for Connected and Automated Vehicles at Moderate or High Traffic Volume and Delay Signalized Intersections to Maximize Its Effectiveness.

Simulation Results Suggest That Connected Automated Vehicle (CAV) Applications That Support Traffic Optimization on Signalized Corridors Can Reduce Vehicle Stops, But Have Limited Impacts on Overall Travel Times and Delay.

A SPaT Data Transmission Latency Analysis Compared DSRC Links Having Shorter Range and Low Latency (Less Than 2 Milliseconds) Against Cellular Links Having Longer Range and Higher Latency (Greater Than 40 Milliseconds).

Cooperative Eco-Driving Was Projected to Reduce Energy Consumption by Seven Percent and Pollutant Emissions by up to 59 Percent in the City of Riverside, California.

The cost to equip 10 intersections with dedicated short range communications (DSRC) was estimated at $70K to $80K in the Seattle area.

CV-based adaptive signal control has potential to increase mainline arterial speeds by an average of 5 percent and reduce maximum intersection queue lengths by 66.7 percent even with low market penetration (5 percent CV).

In Detroit, the design and construction of traffic signal interconnection upgrades, DSRC field infrastructure, and communication systems designed to support CV applications cost $1.33 million on a 6-mile corridor and $1.42 million on a 12-mile corrid

A Federal report highlights best practices for ITS programs that plan to implement connected vehicle (CV) technology.

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE

Focus Areas

Connect

Topics