Comparative analysis indicates that e-scooters produce 98 percent less emissions than a traditional single passenger car, amongst other measures of efficiency.
E-scooter vehicles have the potential to slash emissions, reinvigorate mass transit, and address America’s dependency on cars.
Made Public Date
02/24/2020

199

Nationwide
United States
Identifier
2020-01440
TwitterLinkedInFacebook

Findings
In general, e-scooters were represented to be:

  • More energy efficient than traditional vehicles (e.g. the embedded energy of an e-scooter is less than 1 percent of the embedded energy in an automobile).
  • Cheaper in terms of capitals costs compared to alternatives.
  • Cheaper to fuel than alternatives like public transit, taxis, and personal cars.
    Vehicle Type Distances in Football Field Laps (per Kilowatt Hour) Capital Costs (USD) Fueling Cost of 5 Miles of Daily Transport Over a Year (USD) CO2 Emissions per passenger per gallon (lbs) Weight (lbs)
    Gas Vehicle 3 - $185.10 18.90 lbs 4,100
    Electric Vehicle 17 $53,000 $78.87 2.25 lbs 4,072
    E-Scooter 333 $499 $2.93 0.3 lbs 28

Let's Count the Ways E-Scooters Could Save the City

Let's Count the Ways E-Scooters Could Save the City
Publication Sort Date
12/07/2018
Author
Tillemann, Levi and Lassor Feasley
Publisher
Wired

(Our website has many links to other organizations. While we offer these electronic linkages for your convenience in accessing transportation-related information, please be aware that when you exit our website, the privacy and accessibility policies stated on our website may not be the same as that on other websites.)

Application Taxonomy

Deployment Locations