Foster cooperation among stakeholders when building institutional integration for ITS deployment.
Nationwide experience with institutional integration for a Regional ITS Architecture.
Made Public Date
03/24/2006

91

Florida
United States

27

Phoenix
Arizona
United States

981

Oakland County
California
United States

982

Interstate 95
New Jersey
United States

983

Interstate 95
New York
United States

984

Interstate 95
Connecticut
United States
TwitterLinkedInFacebook
Identifier
2006-00195

Florida's ITS Integration Guidebook

Background

Agencies are now discovering the tangible benefits of coordinating with each other to plan, deploy, and operate ITS components in an integrated manner. The key to a successful interoperable transportation system is to integrate ITS via a systems engineering approach into all stages of planning, design and deployment of transportation projects at the state, regional and local settings. The Florida Department of Transportation District Seven’s guidebook serves as an informational tool in defining the ITS integration context technically and institutionally and recommends an iterative process to achieve overall ITS integration that involves planning, institutional and technical integration processes. At the core of the suggested approach is the iterative process of developing, using and maintaining a Regional ITS Architecture (RIA) as part of an ITS strategic plan, considered the focal activity in planning and implementing ITS integration. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the lessons. Among the lessons learned are the importance of fostering the cooperation of the stakeholders and using an iterative approach when integrating ITS.

Lessons Learned

Institutional integration is key to the success of ITS projects. It is often difficult to bring agencies and other stakeholders together and sustain the relationships required to effect efficient deployment and operation of a system. Institutional and jurisdictional issues can be far more complex than the technical integration of an ITS project. Florida's ITS Integration Guidebook offers the following suggestions to foster cooperation of the stakeholders when building institutional integration:

  • Involve a wide range of participants. Developing a coalition of involved organizations remains a key requirement that should be viewed and fostered as a continual process. Not all stakeholders are members of organizations, but it is mainly the cooperating organizations' planners and implementers, and the ITS consultants and vendors, who are the stakeholders that regularly contribute to ITS development. The range of these organizations includes: transportation, public safety, emergency management, telecommunications agencies, information service providers, and commercial movers of goods. Broadening stakeholder involvement is important because the value of the information disseminated through the systems (connected by way of the RIA) is progressively enhanced as it is used more.
  • Core stakeholders should be people that plan, own or operate ITS systems in their region. They may include representatives from a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), traffic operations department of a DOT, local traffic engineers, transit operators, and emergency management organizations. The more these participating organizations cooperate, communicate, share ideas and information, and solve problems together, the greater the success for ITS integration.
  • In addition, the civic leaders, lobbyists, and advocates bridge institutional gaps. They educate and inform others, promote the ITS program in the region, seek funding, and help obtain additional resources. They are often regional personages such as a county commissioner, a congressman, an MPO director, or a nationally recognized expert who is a local resident. They typically become experts, themselves, on ITS topics, but are just as often supported by dedicated staff that provide background and factual information.
  • For example, the Phoenix metropolitan area cross-jurisdictional traffic signal coordination project demonstrated several levels of integration, emphasizing lead and participatory roles and responsibilities of the different agencies involved. The range of ITS implementers included the State DOT, several city governments, the county government, transit service providers, public safety service agencies, the MPO, the U.S. DOT, and the private sector.
  • Stay Connected. Regular information sharing with a broad range of individuals and organizations is important. Those actively involved in the process must keep those less involved informed. Newsletters, frequently used as an effective tool in accomplishing this goal, are made more convenient as electronic formats become the common practice. It is critical to cultivate understanding and interest in ITS at all levels of the participating agencies early in ITS development. Operations staff needs to understand how coordination of systems and information flows can improve their operational responsibilities, and planning staff needs to understand their role in ITS planning and the roles and the responsibilities of operations staff.
  • Think regionally. Successful deployments can be the best way to convince decision-makers of the benefits of participating in ITS development process. The "EZPass" (automated toll collection) program in the NY-NJ-CT Region gave solid evidence to decision-makers and the public throughout the region of the advantages of both ITS and interagency coordination. While each participating agency to the EZPass system was primarily motivated by their own operational needs and concerns, bringing these organizations together early on in the process, and establishing new relationships cultivated a greater interest in regional transportation issues and regional ITS solutions. However, participants often had difficulty translating the need for ITS integration to their organizations. In many agencies, both senior management and operation staff found the concept of an ITS architecture difficult to explain.
  • Institutional integration was perceived to be the key to successful system integration in a multi-organization project such as Oakland County’s FAST-TRAC (Faster and Safer Travel through Traffic Routing and Advanced Controls) program. One of the most important case study findings for this project was that it was relatively easy to integrate systems, but difficult to integrate agencies. Institutional, jurisdictional and legal challenges far outweighed the technical complexities in integrating an advanced traffic management system with an advanced traveler information system.

This lesson suggests that in order to foster cooperation among stakeholders when building institutional integration, it is important to involve a wide range of participants, stay connected, and think regionally. It is necessary to involve a wide range of participants because the more participating organizations cooperate, communicate, share ideas, and solve problems together, the greater success there is for ITS integration. On the regional scale, it is critical to cultivate understanding and interest in ITS at all levels of the participating agencies early in ITS development. This is key to the most successful system integration projects that cross organizational boundaries.

Florida's ITS Integration Guidebook

Florida's ITS Integration Guidebook
Publication Sort Date
10/01/2002
Author
Center for Urban Transportation Research, College of Engineering, University of South Florida
Publisher
District Seven, Florida Department of Transportation

(Our website has many links to other organizations. While we offer these electronic linkages for your convenience in accessing transportation-related information, please be aware that when you exit our website, the privacy and accessibility policies stated on our website may not be the same as that on other websites.)

Application Areas
System Engineering Elements

Focus Areas Taxonomy: