| ITS Deployment Evaluation

Benefits: Curve Speed Warning (VS05)

14 unique benefits found.

Environmental Impact Evaluation of Connected Vehicle End-of-Ramp Warning in Tampa, Florida Estimated That Annual Carbon Dioxide Emissions Were 240 Kilograms Lower in the Post-Deployment Period.

Date Posted: 11/30/2022 | Source Date:

Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment Program Independent Evaluation: Environmental Impact Assessment—Tampa (THEA)

03/10/2022

Connected Vehicle Speed Limit Warnings Increased Speed Compliance by 16 Percent During a Pilot Test in New York City.

Date Posted: 11/28/2022 | Source Date:

Safety Impact Assessment of New York City Connected Vehicle Pilot Safety Applications

05/01/2022

NYC Connected Vehicle Pilot Found That 83 Percent of Participants Felt Safer When Using the Mobile Pedestrian Crossing App Compared to Not Using It.

Date Posted: 05/28/2022 | Source Date:

New York City CV Pilot Deployment Results and Transition Plan

12/16/2021

Speed Warning System Tested in Minnesota Reduces Vehicle Speed by up to 10 Percent on Curved Road Segments.

Date Posted: 11/23/2021 | Source Date:

In-Vehicle Dynamic Curve-Speed Warnings at High-Risk Rural Curves

03/01/2018

Passive safety treatments were found to be more reliable and affordable than active safety treatments on two-lane rural roads with dangerous horizontal curves in Virginia.

Date Posted: 06/26/2019 | Source Date:

Evaluation of Innovative Approaches to Curve Delineation for Two-Lane Rural Roads

06/02/2018

Sequential Dynamic Curve Warning System reduces the number of vehicles exceeding the speed limit by 10 mph or more by 27.8 percent

Date Posted: 02/09/2016 | Source Date:

Evaluation of the TAPCO Sequential Dynamic Curve Warning System

01/02/2014

Approximately 75 percent of drivers in a large-scale field operational test felt that curve speed warning systems increased safety.

Date Posted: 10/22/2014 | Source Date:

European Large-Scale Field Operational Tests on In-Vehicle Systems: Final results - User acceptance an user-related aspects

11/22/2012

A Benefit Cost analysis shows that dynamic curve speed warning signs have 30 percent effectiveness and an incremental B/C ratio between 2.79 to 5.57 for curves that already have static curve warnings.

Date Posted: 10/02/2012 | Source Date:

Benefit:Cost Analysis of In-Vehicle Technologies and Infrastructure Modifications as a Means to Prevent Crashes Along Curves and Shoulders

12/02/2009

Simulated Rural Highway Driver Warning Systems (RHDWS) showed a potential reduction of critical events by 21 percent, a decrease of 71 percent for runoff-road crashes, and contributed to smoother driving on the curvy highway.

Date Posted: 12/18/2011 | Source Date:

Vehicle infrastructure integration (VII) based road-condition warning system for highway collision prevention

05/28/2009

In Myrtle Creek, Oregon, an advanced curve speed warning system installed on I-5 reduced the speed of 76 percent of drivers surveyed.

Date Posted: 07/11/2008 | Source Date:

Field Evaluation of the Myrtle Creek Advanced Curve Warning System

06/02/2006